Sep 29, 2014
llllucy:

Me at parties

llllucy:

Me at parties

(Source: ceremonialize, via marissa-0h)

Sep 29, 2014

The cast of The Craft (1996)

(Source: filmwitches, via marissa-0h)

Sep 27, 2014
Sep 27, 2014
durnesque-esque:

moonblossom:

steverogershelmethair:

the-goddamazon:

sugaryleopard:

aculturedpearl:

Louboutins are redefining the “nude” pump— now available in five shades.  Great initiative!

Thank you Christian Louboutin. 

This is so important.

Yes, thank you for making more shoes literally none of us will ever be able to afford.

Fashion trickles down though. When a high-end designer like Christian Louboutin acknowledges that there should be variety in “nude” pumps, it will invariably be copied by cheaper and more accessible brands. This is a huge, positive thing.

durnesque-esque:

moonblossom:

steverogershelmethair:

the-goddamazon:

sugaryleopard:

aculturedpearl:

Louboutins are redefining the “nude” pump— now available in five shades.  Great initiative!

Thank you Christian Louboutin. 

This is so important.

Yes, thank you for making more shoes literally none of us will ever be able to afford.

Fashion trickles down though. When a high-end designer like Christian Louboutin acknowledges that there should be variety in “nude” pumps, it will invariably be copied by cheaper and more accessible brands. This is a huge, positive thing.

(via chellmabell)

Sep 27, 2014
bfeliz:

barrio-dandy:

La #Pachuca  A stance in resistAnce. The known unknown pachuca.  #Zootsuit women.  #1940s #1950s #Swing #chicano #BARRIOBOOGIE #vintagestyle #women1940s #styleAsResistance

💚💚😳😍 wow

bfeliz:

barrio-dandy:

La #Pachuca
A stance in resistAnce. The known unknown pachuca.
#Zootsuit women.
#1940s #1950s #Swing #chicano #BARRIOBOOGIE #vintagestyle #women1940s #styleAsResistance

💚💚😳😍 wow

(via mudwerks)

Sep 27, 2014
noblondes:

Today’s Photo Friday is an unidentified Zoot Suit Woman or a Pachuca, from the 1940s. Photo Identifier #64674 
Arizona Historical Society

noblondes:

Today’s Photo Friday is an unidentified Zoot Suit Woman or a Pachuca, from the 1940s. Photo Identifier #64674 

Arizona Historical Society

(via mudwerks)

Sep 27, 2014
Sep 27, 2014
Sep 27, 2014
sorryexcuseforsorry:

THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH OTHER (2014)

sorryexcuseforsorry:

THE IMPORTANCE OF EACH OTHER (2014)

(via indig0down)

Sep 27, 2014

(Source: modernbabylon, via mudwerks)

Sep 27, 2014

(Source: peteneems, via mudwerks)

Sep 27, 2014

bejwelled:

Blue- Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, Yves Klein

(via indig0down)

Sep 27, 2014
mynameiseno:

// LOADING FOR EVER //

mynameiseno:

// LOADING FOR EVER //

(via mudwerks)

Sep 27, 2014
hunters-hollow:

quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:


Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.


I am so happy this post exists. I used to be so self conscious about my boobs. But I mean there’s no way mine could be perky like that. I’m a 34DD. That much boob is so not gonna be naturally lifted.

hunters-hollow:

quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:

Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.

Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.

Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.
So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

I am so happy this post exists. I used to be so self conscious about my boobs. But I mean there’s no way mine could be perky like that. I’m a 34DD. That much boob is so not gonna be naturally lifted.

(Source: denicedenice, via indig0down)

Sep 27, 2014

(Source: shrillmurray, via mudwerks)

Navigate
« To the past Page 1 of 481
About
My life as it is, was, and will be expressed through a random sequence of photos, words, and video. Enjoy my worthless exhibition. Subscribe via RSS.